RSS Feed

‘Consumer’ Category

  1. Tipping In Canada vs. USA

    December 14, 2010 by Gail

    maple leaf

    I receive a monthly newsletter from a corporate travel agency, and this piece in the December edition caught my eye. I found it amusing that the Canadian section is quite brief, while the American section is much longer and very specific. Granted, this is a corporate rather than consumer focus, so the tips are for business people on company money. (I don’t know why the Canadian part left out suggestions for taxis and such. They probably assume that Canadians know how to tip in Canada, but then why have a Canadian section at all?)

    Here’s the copy-and-paste from the newsletter:

    Tipping Guidelines When Travelling

    For business travellers, tipping can be confusing. How much is not enough? How much is too much?

    A golden rule: Reward good service and don’t feel pressured into rewarding bad service. And remember that a dollar or two might not be a big deal to you, but to your server or maid, it could really make a difference to their family.

    How To Tip.

    Canada

    At hotels, a suitable tip for the valet is $5; bellmen, $1-2 per bag; maids, $1-2 per day. If you’re ordering room service, find out if a tip is included in the cost of the room service. If it is, you don’t need to tip, but if not, then 15 per cent is an acceptable amount. It’s not necessary to tip the concierge, but if you’re happy with the service then a small amount at the end of your stay is welcome.

    United States

    In the U.S., tipping rates are slightly higher than in Canada – 20 per cent at sit-down restaurants (25 per cent for bigger groups), 20 per cent on large bar tabs, $1 per drink or $2 if your drink is one of those $15 martinis. At Starbucks or a cashier-service restaurant: $1 or pocket change in the tip jar on the counter. At takeout restaurants, gift the hostess between $2 and $5. A good rule for cabs is $2 for a $5-ride; $3 for a $10-ride; and 20 per cent for everything else. You get extra points for tipping cash when you pay by credit card. At hotels, tip the valet $2-$5; bellmen, $5 for a bag or two and more than $10 if he’s carrying an entire cart of your luggage. The maids should get $5-$10 a night (depending on how expensive your hotel is). For hotel room service: 15-20 per cent of the bill. Don’t forget the concierge – $5 for information; $10 for scoring you reservations or arrangements of any kind.

    Why the difference?

    The simple answer is that our service sector wages are generally higher, or to put it another way, the American minimum wage is lower, depending on how you view the comparison. In Canada we pay more and tip less, in the USA they pay less and tip more. The lower minimum wage in the USA has bred a tipping culture that either makes us look stingy when we’re down in the States or makes the Americans look generous up here. Where you grew up shapes your expectations of service and what you’re willing to pay for it.

    As for me, I am a DIY, self-serve kind of consumer. It’s a major reason why you won’t find me on a cruise ship. I rarely stay in hotels. I’d cut my own hair if I could. I’ll take transit or walk before I’ll hail a cab. I book my own travel, carry my own bags, fuel my own car, and prefer not to have service or be forced to pay for it if I don’t want it. If every restaurant was self-serve, like eating at IKEA or Panera Bread, I’d be happy. I don’t like being served because it makes me feel lazy, and I prefer not to have my conversations interrupted. Tipping is something I’m resigned to doing at restaurants, but I will tip in any service situation when I feel it’s been earned (hairdresser, taxi, etc.).

    That said, I know there are lots of people who enjoy being served, whether it’s fine dining or a regular restaurant meal. And sure, maybe if I’m a wobbly senior citizen I would be pleased to have someone help me versus the likelihood of dropping my food. At any rate, if I were a higher-maintenance person, I’d be pro-service environment and should tip accordingly.

    I’m all for service providers working extra hard for tips (I’m grateful when wedding clients tip me for going above and beyond the call of duty), but I think people should be obliged to tip only when it’s warranted. This is where it gets complicated…

    There is the touchy subject of illegal workers in the U.S. who the government refuses to acknowledge until they have to — immigration law reform, anyone? always an issue when the economy is in decline — but turn a blind eye to because it gives them a “free” labour force. Sure, the workers don’t pay taxes but the risks are high: these people have no protection from exploitation or abuse. There are no statistics on them because they’re not supposed to be working, yet they do, because they work for people who get away with not paying them properly and work for tips to survive.

    It gets even more complicated because the perception of many Americans is that these illegal workers are taking jobs away from the citizenship-holding public. I’ve heard this in other countries, too, and it couldn’t be further from the truth.

    But back to tipping… it’s very arbitrarily-applied, anyway — does anyone tip their mechanic? Or the librarian? Or the butcher? Or the ice cream vendor?

    Do we really need that much service, anyway? Couldn’t we pay people more for the service that’s provided (i.e., better base wages) than make them rely on tips? We don’t need a tipping culture to receive good service — much of Europe, Australia, and New Zealand doesn’t tip and there’s plenty of good service. Mind you, people will argue that’s not the case…

    There is the argument that we put people out of work if we cut back on service. States such as Oregon and New Jersey only have full-service gas stations (though they state safety rather than employment reasons), where the rest of the USA and all of Canada have both self- and full-serve, although full-service stations are becoming extinct outside of NJ and OR. But we don’t NEED full-service stations, so why am I forced to use them, NJ and OR? The pay-at-the-pump options have reduced drive-offs. I’m sure we can create better jobs for people — let’s work on that, instead!

    Are you a big tipper? Do you subscribe to the guidelines in the article above? Do you stick to suggested percentages or make your own? Do you tip even when your service was mediocre?

    Share this:

  2. Petty Thievery Strikes Again, Three Years Later

    November 26, 2010 by Gail

    GEF_3601
    Astoria, NY

    Well, it’s been three years to the month, but my wallet was stolen AGAIN, this time not when I was travelling but while I was at a cafe at Eaton Centre. This time it’s simpler because:

    • I’m not in a foreign country
    • I don’t need a translator at the police station
    • I don’t have to rely on the kindness of police officers to take up a collection so I can take a bus to the airport because I only have foreign currency
    • I don’t have to sleep in an airport
    • nor do I have to make my way from one airport to the next in a third country
    • I can go home and eat instead of go hungry because I can’t pay for anything and I’m not in one place long enough to get emergency cash
    • et cetera!

    In short, this isn’t ANYWHERE near the saga of Fez-Barcelona-London-Toronto. I still haven’t written out the whole story, but there’s part of it.

    I cancelled the bank and credit cards, but by that point the thieves enjoyed multiple shopping sprees. I decided to report this to the police in case the thieves decide to take things a step further, i.e., identity fraud. I have plenty of information in the wallet to do it: drivers license, health card, auto insurance, etc.

    To put things in perspective, if this had happened a week ago just before my trip to New York or during the trip, I’d be in trouble and it would’ve killed my weekend. As it stands, there was hardly any cash, I’m REALLY glad they didn’t take my DSLR (which had the newest lens on it and was right beside my bag), and the stuff I’d just bought at Best Buy and need for Sunday’s event wasn’t touched. It could have been so much worse! I’ll get a new debit card in the morning — I’m a block away from my bank, rather than six time zones — and get a replacement driver’s license for $10 right away.

    While this sort of thing is extremely aggravating and inconvenient, I didn’t lose more than $30, postage stamps, and the time it takes to cancel and replace cards. The important part is, I’m not losing any travel time and this weekend can continue as planned.

    Share this:

  3. Back Online But Man, What A Malarky!

    April 27, 2010 by Gail

    GEF_7623

    • Saturday: arrived home from second High Park shoot and discovered no internet. Tried all the usual tricks and tests, to no avail, on Saturday and Sunday in the few minutes I was home.
    • Monday: finally got a moment to call the cable company (for the Canadians, that would be Rogers). They couldn’t get in a tech until Tuesday, so I offered to run out to a retail outlet and swap my cable box for a new one. Didn’t work. I said nobody else in my house has Rogers that I knew of, and Rogers confirmed this.
    • Tuesday: raced home early to meet tech. He discovered my cable switched with another one, in the stairwell. He switched it back, I got my data feed. Neighbour arrived home, said Rogers installed their equipment on Saturday, inadvertently unplugging my internet. They turned on their TV to discover they had no cable feed while I was plugged in. We BOTH called Rogers, who said my case was closed so the neighbour had to call the tech again…

    In the meantime, the neighbours dug out a splitter so they could watch TV and I could be online. First of all, Rogers should have KNOWN they sent a tech here on Saturday to do an installation, it would’ve explained everything. And what was that tech doing swapping cables in the first place?? Nothing was labelled. After each of us called Rogers, we both got billing credits.

    Now that I’m plugged in again, whoa email, I’ve got some catching up to do… I tried to deal with the urgent stuff by mobile phone, but much of it had to wait.

    Photo: Natalia on a random couch I found in Markham on Sunday while I was scouting locations for next weekend’s wedding.

    Share this:

  4. “There’s No Place Like Home…”

    March 29, 2010 by Gail

    "There's no place like home, there's no place like home..."

    I can’t remember the last time I entered a contest, but this is one I want to win! What’s up for grabs, you ask? A red Lola Epiphanie camera bag, that’s what.

    http://www.beyond-snapshots.com/blog/2010/03/26/a-chance-to-have-your-own-epiphanie-contest-to-win-an-epiphanie-camera-bag/

    I have TONNES of red in my photo collection. What to choose?

    I decided upon the most iconic red I could think of: Judy Garland’s ruby slippers from The Wizard of Oz, in the (Smithsonian) Museum of American History, Washington, DC. The shoes have seen better days, but they must be worth a fortune by now. I shot this almost five years ago through museum glass with a cheap digital point-and-shoot, so I had to glam it up a bit to match the feeling from the film. Technically it’s not a great photo, I have much better ones that I could enter. But that weekend in DC was a memorable trip, the last road trip David and I took together before I had to wait out my visa in Vancouver and before he got sick. If I don’t win, at least I took a happy skip down memory lane… a yellow-bricked one.

    Wish me luck!

    Share this:

  5. The Little Camera(s) That Could

    March 16, 2010 by Gail

    2323

    Today was errand day at the House of Fielding — errands before and after work. Eastside. Downtown. Uptown. Downtown. Eastside. Westside back home. While riding the streetcars and subways I was experimenting with the cameraphone to see what it was capable of. As with any mobile phone, the best conditions are always bright and outdoors. I was rather pleased with the sharpness of the numbers in the photo above.

    You might be wondering: why even bother taking photos with such crappy phone cameras? They look terrible! Because for me what makes a good photo is its composition, and that has nothing to do with equipment. Deciding what to put in that frame is not just an interpretation of electronics and glass but instinct. You can have the most expensive camera in the world, but if the content is uninteresting, a good lens and expensive sensor cannot rescue it. So I am constantly on the lookout for how life fits in frames in interesting ways — what goes in, what stays out, looking ahead for two objects to cross paths at the perfect time, hoping a gust of wind blows that bottle to exactly where I want it, photographing the dog waiting patiently outside the store, watching for the break in the cloud for the sun to peek through. It’s not just taking a photo, it’s how the Germans translate it — “making a photo”. (And probably lots of other languages I don’t know.)

    Today was a first, of sorts: I shelled out $15 for a 2GB micro SD card to expand the memory in the phone. Up ’til now I have always been far too cheap to splash out on memory for mobile devices, but the videocamera feature on this one won’t work at ALL without a media card. Previously I’ve always just cleared out photos and text messages (I’ve collected some of the weird ones to show), but I capitulated this time to avoid the dreaded “Memory Full!” message.

    Testing how it handles backlighting:

    IMG00014

    IMG00015

    IMG00018

    I shot a short video on the streetcar before I had to disembark, and tonight when I converted the video from 3GP to mpeg (using Kigo Video Converter) then mpeg to mp4 (using Handbrake) — and that was after using Bluetooth to transfer the files from the phone to the computer! — the double-conversion somehow had the effect of speeding up the video (this is actual size):

    It’s running at twice the original speed!

    And finally, a photo taken not with the mobile but the 5-year old Canon A520, which you can buy from eBay these days for less than $10. Did you know there are manual settings on these digicams? It’s true — though limited, I set the aperture and shutter speed myself for this picture:

    IMG_4173_edit

    It was a funny moment that brought me to that tree. I was taking photos of the sunset by a hospital with the phone’s camera, and a patient in a wheelchair watched me take photos of the trees. He was a little far away, so when he called out to me I thought he was checking to see whether I was taking a photo of him (and asking me not to). I indicated I was only shooting the trees. A couple of minutes later, he wheeled up and told me I would find a much better tree next to the building behind some other trees, about 50m away.

    “You’ll like that one,” he said excitedly. “It’s very twisty and people like to take pictures of it.”

    He was right! And it was then that I figured out he wasn’t shooing me away two minutes before, he was waving me over to the tree!

    Share this:

  6. I’ve Gone To The Dark Side

    March 11, 2010 by Gail

    That’s right, I’ve upgraded my phone. Finally.

    upgraded

    This is why:

    1. The wireless company gave me the Blackberry for free.
    2. I’ve kept all my features, except free incoming call airtime (it was the only one I couldn’t transfer from the basic handset to the smartphone) without being subjected to price increases, and locked in the price for two years.
    3. My new plan that includes smartphone data (versus the unlimited PCS data I had before) is only $2.30 more per month than what I paid previously.
    4. My 100 minutes per month free long distance would expire in August.
    5. I couldn’t check my Mobile Me email on the old browser.

    The iPod Touch will still get used daily, but since I can only use it with wi-fi, I couldn’t pass up a free phone upgrade. We’ll see if my cameraphone shots look any better!

    Share this:

  7. On Why Bigger Isn’t Necessarily Better

    January 20, 2010 by Gail

    southern Iceland in a Super JeepWeekend Outtakes

    When people talk to me about buying a digital camera, there’s one point I stress more than anything else:

    Do not let the number of MPs (megapixels) convince you that the camera is better.

    Sales people will try and impress you with numbers because most people don’t know what those numbers mean. I’m convinced that many sales people don’t know what those numbers mean, either, but since the MPs are stamped right there on the camera, they will try and tell you more is better in the hopes that you’ll believe them. Don’t believe them!

    Here’s a pretty good article that showed up in my Twitter stream that explains why the megapixel count is more than a marketing ploy, it is a scam:

    The Great Megapixel Swindle: An Example:
    http://petavoxel.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/mp-swindle-example/

    Let me give you my own example, comparing two cameras, one with a low megapixel count and one with a high megapixel count. (As you can see by the side-by-sides above, the cameras have slightly different aspect ratios, but it won’t affect the argument, which is megapixels overall.)

    southern Iceland in a Super Jeep

    This was shot in Iceland with the Pentax K100D, my first DSLR, which I sold last spring (reluctantly, because I loved that camera — the straight-out-of-the-camera JPEGs were great). It is an entry-level 6.1MP DSLR, with a maximum resolution size of 3008×2000 pixels. It was a sunny day, the ISO was relatively low (200), and the focus was for the entire landscape (infinity) so everything should be in focus. Click on the picture to view it at full resolution in a new window.

    Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/1000)
    Aperture: f/5.6
    Focal Length: 33 mm
    ISO Speed: 200
    Image Width: 3000
    Image Height: 2000

    Weekend Outtakes

    Now, here’s a photo taken by my brother, Allan, in Vancouver with his Canon G10, which is a point-and-shoot with a whopping 14.7 MPs. It wasn’t shot at max resolution (4416×3312 pixels) — which is another beef about marketing, and I’ll get to that in a bit — but the important point is that it was shot at a resolution GREATER than the 1st photo, specifically 3753×2814, or 17.55% bigger. Ignore the colours and contrast, just look at the sharpness and detail. Click on the pic to view it large in a new window.

    Note that the ISO (or film speed) is 80, which means the sensitivity is lower and therefore the noise level should be lower than the Iceland shot, for which an ISO of 200 was used. In basic terms, the Iceland shot should theoretically be grainier, or “noisier”, than the Vancouver shot. The Vancouver photo was taken at half the shutter speed of the Iceland photo, but 1/500 is still fast and there should be no shake.

    Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/500)
    Aperture: f/4.5
    Focal Length: 30.5 mm
    ISO Speed: 80
    Image Width: 3753
    Image Height: 2814

    I’ve sliced away some parts of both photos to do another side-by-side at 100% (Iceland left, Vancouver right):

    See the difference? Which do you find grainier? The Vancouver photo on the right side was shot by the 14.7MP Canon G10, which is more than double the MPs of the Pentax K100D at 6.1MPs on the left side. Now, part of the difference in quality is the lens glass. I am fairly certain that I took the Iceland photo with my Pentax kit lens, the 18-55mm, and a kit lens is the lowliest of all lenses in a brand line. Kit lenses aren’t always terrible, but it’s comparable in quality to the stock stereo you get with your car — for the average person it’s bearable, but people who enjoy music are going to replace it, anyway. On a camera, a kit lens is soon to be replaced, too.

    The major factor in the difference is the sensor. If you were to go and read the sensor specs for both cameras, this is what you’ll find:

    Canon G10: 1/1.7-inch type Charge Coupled Device (CCD), which is 7.17 mm x 5.31 mm
    Pentax K100D: 23.5mm x 15.7mm CCD sensor

    Now here is where size does matter! As you can see, the Pentax K100D has a much bigger sensor than the Canon G10 — around 3x bigger. DSLR lenses are bigger because their chip sensors are bigger. It is the one of the reasons why point-and-shoot cameras are more compact, even with a zoom, because it requires less glass to bring light to that little sensor. When companies try and cram more pixels into a small sensor, it actually reduces the quality of the photo.

    This article by digitalcamerainfo.com puts it this way:

    Fitting more megapixels in the same small amount of physical space means that all the receptor sites on the sensor must be smaller, which means that each site has less light hitting it. Less light per pixel means images that are less clear and sharp.

    However, between two different manufacturers making CCDs that are the same size, there’s no way to know which produces better-quality photos using spec numbers because they use different computations when capturing and processing pixels. At that point it is a qualitative difference rather than quantitative. The only way to compare is to compare their photos, and that’s where personal preferences come in. But if you compare any DSLR to any point-and-shoot, the DSLR will always come out on top when the photos are displayed larger — because of the sensor, and because of the glass.

    What’s that beef you were talking about?

    I mentioned that Allan didn’t take that Vancouver shot at full resolution, which is what I was hoping for in my example. Actually, I couldn’t find any Canon G10 photos in his Flickr collection taken at full resolution. This is actually very common, and most people don’t think about it when they buy a point-and-shoot: if megapixels are such a good thing, why don’t people take advantage of them?

    For one thing, the file sizes are way too large. My Nikon D300 is a 12.3MP camera, and the largest photo I can make is 4288×2848 pixels with a JPEG-format file size of around 4-8MBs (depending on what I’m shooting) and that’s plenty. (My RAW files are much bigger, at 9-12MBs.) Why would a point-and-shoot, with a sensor roughly a third of the size, need more pixels than a DSLR if it can only capture a third of the detail? Because it’s a gimmick! You’d never email a full-size snapshot around, and it’s far too big for a web page, Facebook, or any social media site. That size is really useless unless you’re considering enlarging it to hang over your fireplace.

    Which brings me to my next point: you’d never want to enlarge a point-and-shoot snapshot, anyway, because even at the size I showed you, which is probably at least 75% of its resolution capacity, it has purple fringing and artifacts. You can barely make out the trees on the mountains. The level of detail is less than ideal; the cost of enlargement would not be worthwhile. The shot itself is good, the colours are set to vivid (that can be toned down in Photoshop), but the detail can’t be increased because Canon’s sensor is too small. It’s about pixel quality, not quantity.

    But what about the price?

    When you take away the bulk of the DSLR, there’s usually a gripe about the price versus a compact camera. It’s true, they can be pricey, but if you’re an amateur or a beginner, the prices of entry-level DSLRs are actually lower than the higher-end compact cameras. Using the same cameras in my example, I bought my Pentax K100D in May 2007 for about US$500, including the Pentax SMC-DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens. The Canon G10′s suggested retail price today is US$500. Which means that if you scout for a used Pentax K100D on Craigslist right now, you could probably get one with the kit lens for about half of what the Canon G10 costs currently, and make better-quality photos for much cheaper.

    I try and tell people that for the cost of the new compact cameras, they could invest in an entry-level DSLR and even get a lens, but I think people are reluctant to learn how to use a DSLR. I would be willing to teach ANYBODY how to use their DSLR, if that would convince them to make the move.

    It’s not that I dislike compact cameras or even Canon, not at all. In fact I owned Canon compact digitals for five years (2002-2007) before I bought my first DSLR, which was a Pentax. I still recommend Pentax for its value, especially for entry-level users. My current DSLR is a Nikon. (As you can see, I’m not particularly brand loyal. There is no need to be except that switching an entire system is expensive due to the lenses and bodies being incompatible between brands; each brand has strengths and weakness across all their lines.)

    I learned composition on compacts, which is an important skill regardless of equipment. I still shoot with compacts on occasion, for video and some snapshots. I think it’s very possible to take decent photos with point-and-shoots if the settings are used properly (and displayed small so their flaws don’t show), and I have actually sold photos taken by compacts. But the newer point-and-shoot models mystify most people because they have a lot of bells and whistles. Nobody likes to read the manual (I generally don’t, either, I only use them as reference tools but usually I go online), but the manuals are written by technical writers and they don’t tell you how to take a good photo, they only tell you about settings and specs.

    I think this is the longest post I’ve ever written on the subject of photography, but I wanted to take the time to write it out because photographic equipment at the average consumer level is rife with confusion and misleading information. People are bombarded with features that they don’t understand. At a professional level, sales people have less sway with buyers because pros have the technical knowledge and a more watchful eye on the industry. Professionals are pickier about their equipment and view it as a business investment. However, the consumer market is big money and companies like Nikon, Canon, Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung, Pentax, Casio, Kodak, Konica, and all the rest sell point-and-shoots every day to people who don’t know what to look for in a camera. If you want to compare them, I suggest the side-by-side comparison table feature over at DPReview.com’s buying guide section. There are also comprehensive reviews if you want to go more in-depth, and summary-length versions of the reviews if you just want to get their rating.

    My recommendation is to do all your research before you walk into the camera store, then try out a few cameras that are your top picks to see how they feel in your hands, if the controls are in logical places, and if the way you would use it requires digging around in menus versus the settings at your fingertips. Better yet: borrow them from friends or let your friends show you their cameras. It’s also a good idea to read some reviews and ratings, but ultimately, you should look at the photos you already take — portraits? low light? action? landscapes? — and base your search criteria on the style of your shooting rather than gimmicky things like megapixels and dozens of “modes” (eg. snow mode, beach mode, museum mode). Hmmm… I’m getting into another topic (buying), so I’d better stop here.

    And if I’ve confused you even more, I take full responsibility and welcome any questions to clear it up!

    Share this:

  8. Winter Raccoon + Wireless Windbagging

    December 15, 2009 by Gail

    Get a load of that raccoon hat! So fetching! Sai and I met up with Natalia this evening to prep for tomorrow’s filming of a winter concert at a primary school. More than 100 little kids belting out holiday tunes… I’m sure this would find some readers beating a hasty retreat or putting fingers in their collective ears, but personally I think it will be really, really cute. Bring on the cute, I say!

    In totally different news, now that I’m using Photobooth, I thought I should relegate the craptastic cameraphone pictures to a different space and not let the non-DSLR photos take over this website. Step in Twitpic, which is a picture feature for Twitter from the mobile phone (or smartphone, i.e. Blackberry, iPhone, what-have-you). I’ll be sending the silly stuff from the cameraphone directly to Twitpic and they’ll end up in Twitter, out of the way unless clicked on. You’ll see my Twitter feed on the sidebar — that’s where I’ll be posting most of my goofy mobile phone shots.

    The Telus retention people have been on my case for months, sending me direct mail pieces and calling me because my 2-year contract is up very soon. This is the best time to renegotiate the existing contract terms, but I’m still sitting on the telecom fence. A smartphone is very tempting — the iPhone and Blackberry the most obvious choices for my level of use — but frankly I’m quite resistant to using any smartphones although the GPS and data would be helpful from time to time. When I see people with such devices I think it’s often such a waste of features because they only use a fraction of what smartphones can do and I have to ask myself: are these really necessary? Do I really need a smartphone? So far I’ve been able to answer no to that question — I can read my email, browse most of the web pages I need, and read news headlines on Twitter on my tiny, low-profile Samsung U510. When I have a wi-fi signal I switch to my 2+ year old iPod Touch which still works just fine. Answering “no” to whether I need a gadget is a very non-geeky response from a geeky person — I mean, geeky people are very much gadget collectors, but my budget is strictly for tools of my trade. There is also an added monthly charge to the wireless bill for the data and right now I have unlimited data for a very small fee. Maybe if I get the phone for free and there’s no increase for the additional data… especially U.S.-carrier data, which easily doubles my bill with a single roadtrip. U.S. (voice) roaming is cheap, but data is not!

    Probably by next year I’ll be ready for a smartphone upgrade without feeling like a poser, but for now unless a telecom company hands one over for free or my current not-quite-as-smart phone breaks, the Telus retention people will have to keep sweetening the deal.

    Music for today: Elvis Presley’s “Wooden Heart” — an oldie but a goodie, unless you dislike Elvis…

    (more…)

    Share this:

  9. The Cameraphone Dump

    October 14, 2009 by Gail

    OK, now that I’ve had some sleep — typical: an intended nap turned into a crash-and-burn — I can start working through my ‘To Do’ list, which includes dumping photos off my phone from the weekend.

    Some highway scenes:

    (more…)

    Share this:

  10. Beth’s Red Shoes

    October 8, 2009 by Gail

    a girl's best friend(s)

    I’m in editing mode, and I’m supposed to be editing photos of people but I couldn’t help but edit some photos of Beth’s red wedding shoes. I have a thing for red shoes, and these were gorgeous! Click on the photo above to see it larger on my photo site.

    Beth's red shoes

    GEF_7044_edit

    Share this: