Archive for ◊ November, 2005 ◊

30 Nov 2005 You brought me to the vet. I hate you.
 |  Category: Critters + Creatures, Hugh, Photography  | 4 Comments

Since David is busy having a blood transfusion, I committed the ultimate act of bravery: taking Hugh to the vet for his shots. Believe you me, I wasn’t looking forward to it, especially after all the stories I heard about previous trips to the vet. But I suspected he was having some other problems, so it had to be done.

To make a long story short, we survived. More on this later.

29 Nov 2005 Chemo Today
 |  Category: cameraphone, Living with Cancer  | 3 Comments



ADDITION: Tuesday, 11pm

Dave’s Logbook: Name, Rank and Medical Report

29 Nov 2005 An Ode to the Lowly Hydrant
 |  Category: Flickr, Photography  | Leave a Comment

in front of Rockefeller Center

Hey! My photo of this hydrant in front of the Rockefeller Center was featured in Utata!

Utata: in front of Rockefeller Center

Funny, that. I shot this hydrant specifically for the Flickr group called The Birdsill Holly Society, and it ends up here. ‘The Birdsill Holly Society’ is one of my favourite Flickr photo pools; I actively seek out interesting hydrants for it, which guarantees at least a stare or two from passersby. I took this in front of NBC Studios, so it was more like three or four stares.

29 Nov 2005 Three Cheers For Recycling
 |  Category: Consumer, Rants  | 2 Comments

Hip!
Hip!
Hooray!

The other night I successfully completed my first attempt at creating a photo book, and I used recycled materials:

  • cardboard from Amazon.com shipments
  • ribbon from gifts received
  • an old tablecloth dug out of David’s junk storage containers

It’s amazing how much stuff can be recycled rather than buying things new. At the same time, I can’t believe the things that people throw away.

I went to the dollar store yesterday near our house for the first time, and I’m feeling guilty as a result of it. Why?

I found large numbers of items which EASILY cost more than $1 to produce. Dollar stores are everywhere, and how they manage to make a profit is that everything comes from China, where the labour costs next to nothing. I’ve never been entirely comfortable with the idea of supporting an economy with such an atrocious record of human rights violations, especially one where obviously people are not getting paid a working wage. If they were, we’d be paying more than a dollar for many of those goods on the shelves. I’m not saying most of the inventory is worth much more than that — the stuff barely holds together after it leaves the store — but there’s still the cost of human labour in addition to machinery, importing, distribution, etc.

It’s not that I wish to pay ridiculous sums of money for cheap goods at a big box store rather than a dollar store. Dollar stores have a limited selection of goods, anyway, they’re not direct competitors for any one type of store. There will always be a market for cheap goods. But what makes things worse is that because the items are so incredibly cheap, we don’t think twice about throwing them away. Then buying more of the same! It’s not really the act of buying that I’m railing against, it’s the consumption-quick disposal-consumption cycle that gets fed by the steady increase of a wider selection of disposable goods at prices which cannot support fair costs for labour. They may not label themselves as “The Disposable Goods Store”, but society views dollar stores that way. Either our desire for quality items (manufactured by people getting paid properly) is diminished, or our consideration for the energy that is required to make a product is superseded by what we’re willing to pay for it. In other words, we don’t care if Chinese people work for pennies as long as we don’t pay more than pennies.

How this relates to me fumbling around with making a photo book from recycled materials is that it took me so long to create the damn thing that I had time to ask myself the following questions:

“How much would I pay for someone to make this for me?”
“How much is the other person worth to me that I would make this for them?”
“How much easier it would be if I just BOUGHT one?!?”
“What can I do to make this easier next time?”
“Do Chinese people ask themselves, ‘Why would a Westerner pay for such crap?’”

28 Nov 2005 Because Nothing Says ‘Thanksgiving’ Like Inflatable Advertising
 |  Category: Travel  | 2 Comments

Photoset: Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade

We stayed in the perfect location to see the parade, less than two blocks away. We didn’t even have to check out first — we had enough time to see the parade, have brunch, return to the hotel, then check out. It’s a good thing, too, the subways along Broadway looked pretty crowded.

We got showered, dressed, headed down the street and lo and behold — there was SpongeBob SquarePants floating by! We even managed to make our way to the barriers at West 58th, which was good for my cousin, who’s a head shorter than I am, and I’m 5’3″ (160cm)! Kids were hoisted onto shoulders, but I couldn’t very well do that for Maureen.

The forecast was for rain or snow, but we got neither — a few drops splattered for less than five minutes, but otherwise the weather held out, with even some sunny periods. The organisers only cancel the parade due to high winds, which can cause the helium-filled balloons to knock over posts into the crowd. I only found out later, via the news on my mobile phone, that towards the end of the parade there was an accident involving a young girl and her older sister, sending them to the hospital with minor injuries.

The parade itself seemed shorter than I’d expected; for the Mother of All Parades in the U.S. I was expecting something bigger, maybe. I’d never seen the parade on television, even though this marks its 79th year, I’d only heard about it. After all, there is no Macy’s in Canada (or any other country, for that matter, apart from U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam). But it’s the most popular parade, probably owing to those huge inflatable balloons that anyone can see, even little people. Most parades just have floats, which are less visible but don’t require dozens of handlers.

I brought the Pentax K-1000 and two lenses (50mm and 80-200mm zoom), the Canon A80, three flash cards, and an extra sweater, hoping to get some good crowd shots. Fat chance! I had even less room to move than in Times Square for New Year’s — there was NO WAY I could even move my hand far enough down the barrel to use the zoom, it was that tight. It’s a good thing I’m not claustrophobic. Plus, the jostling and cloudy weather weren’t conducive to careful film shooting and manual adjustments; it made more sense to use the digicam. I let Maureen move to the barrier for a better view, and I hung back a little, aiming for higher angle photos and using the Canon’s vari-angle screen to fake some height. I’m sure the people behind me must’ve been annoyed every time my arm shot up to take video or a photo, but that’s what we short people must do!

27 Nov 2005 NYC Recap: Hudson Hotel
 |  Category: Travel  | 6 Comments


My cousin who lives in upstate New York is moving to California in a few weeks, so we decided to spend Thanksgiving together in New York City before she left the East Coast and David would have dinner with his mother.

David’s health during the week made me reassess the feasibility of this trip, but after monitoring the situation on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, we decided it was OK for me to go to New York overnight and return as planned on Thursday evening.

I used Hotwire this time to see what hotel deals were available for Midtown. I was expecting higher demand, what with it being the holidays and the annual Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and the expected crowds (estimates run in the area of 2.4 million spectators). I’d found some deals in the Upper East Side, but figured I’d gamble on getting in closer to the action along the west side, even though sites such as Hotwire don’t divulge the name of the hotel or its exact location until after the purchase is made.

I lucked out this time, getting a hotel less than two blocks off Broadway, a block from Columbus Circle metro station, near Central Park West:

Hudson Hotel
356 West 58th Street

I read hotel reviews on various travel sites, and the number one complaint was how small the rooms are. I don’t know if the majority of people just don’t do their research or are accustomed to expansive hotel rooms, but New York is high-density living and space is at a premium. It’s clearly stated on the website that the rooms are compact:

“Inspired by the romance of ocean travel, and reminiscent of a private cabin on an upscale yacht, Hudson’s 1000 guest rooms – most with gorgeous views of the Private Park – have walls richly paneled in imported African wood, flowing white curtains, sleek stainless steel tables, crisp white linens, brass-riveted furniture and Starck’s modern take on the classic U.S. Naval chair. Bedside lamps with allegorical images designed by renowned painter Francesco Clemente lend a spirit of dreamlike fantasy to the room.”

I’m a long-time hosteller — I’m used to tight spaces and bunk beds and sharing European-sized bathrooms, but I was curious to see how the Hudson would manage to fit 1,000 hotel rooms in a single building. This I had to see for myself!

The traffic into New York City was, in a word, nuts, but really only towards the Lincoln Tunnel and it was MUCH worse leaving the city. I arrived at Port Authority 45 minutes later than scheduled, but I took an express subway so it was really only two stops to the hotel.

I was warned by Mister M, who’d stayed at the Hudson recently, that the hotel was hard to find because it lacked signage out front, and he wasn’t kidding! If you visit their website, a photo of the front entrance will fade in, and there is absolutely no sign whatsoever. At street level there are automatic doors leading towards a set of escalators, which I took a shot of here with my cameraphone. The escalators take you straight up to the lobby, which also has no mention of where you are.

Hudson Hotel

It’s like entering an alternative universe, where everyone is aware of their co-ordinates. Everyone, that is, except you.

‘Hmmm,’ I mused, ‘I must be here, then.’

That was when my cousin Maureen rushed to greet me. I was relieved to see her, since she said she would drive… rather brave, I thought. It’s the eve of Thanksgiving, and I witnessed the rivers of traffic on the way in. But she said she took the bus instead, so that explains how she beat me to the hotel.

I checked in at the Anonymous Counter of Black-Garbed Reception Staff, and showed my room card to the elevator man. I guess the Hudson skimped on the card-coded elevator system to finance the ultra-trendy elegant-by-day, disco-by-night flooring seen here in my other cameraphone shots:

Hudson HotelHudson Hotel

When we exited the elevator and cruised down the corridors, it really did feel like being on a ship — the room doors were very close together. I opened our door and immediately started laughing: this is DEFINITELY the smallest hotel room I’d ever seen! But I was impressed with how they designed the room for best use of space.

Hudson Hotel

I would never recommend a standard room for people, say, over 200lbs (91kgs). The bathroom would be too small. There is literally just enough space to open the door — the sink is directly in front of the door. There is probably less than two feet between the toilet and the wall. The bathtub is more of a glorified shower, but if you’re so inclined you could push aside the curtain and put on a show through the plexiglass wall separating the sleeping area and the bathroom. Except there’s a tiny desk right below, on the other side of the glass, so it might be a more intimate show than someone, say, sitting at the desk working on a laptop might be prepared for.

The other scenario I don’t recommend for a stay at the Hudson Hotel is with luggage. My cousin and I only took overnight bags, which fit fine in the closet but anything larger won’t fit under the (child-sized) desk, beside the bed, or underneath it because the beds are low to the floor. There is only enough space around the bed for — you guessed it — one pair of legs. Amazingly, they fit a small television, stereo, and hotel bits and bobs in a tall narrow cupboard in one corner of the room beside the desk. Everything you’d find in a standard American hotel room (including an air conditioner behind the headboard!), but much smaller. Not quite Lilliputian, but similar dimensions.

I loved it — for our purposes, this hotel was great. We didn’t need more room than what we had, the bed was comfy and spacious (that’s the priority!), and everything was within easy walking distance.

Practically the first item of the evening was to hit the sushi restaurant a few doors down, and it was like manna from heaven… I hadn’t eaten sushi since I was in Vancouver, and it was even better and cheaper than my last sushi experience in New York. There were also three 24-hour pharmacies nearby, and I got a good deal on a 5-pack of film at the local CVS. I was so happy to be getting around on public transit, without car dependency, and the best part — being a pedestrian again.

After a walk around Midtown, we even had dessert and coffee at a little late-night restaurant across the street from the hotel. I really missed being in a city, where the restaurants are open late for nighthawks like me.

27 Nov 2005 For the Record, I’m a Bit of a Grammar Nazi
 |  Category: Rants  | 6 Comments

OK, I confess: this is one of my grammar pet peeves, perhaps the biggest one of all — the usage of ‘and I’ versus ‘and me’.

It drives me bananas when people take the ‘and I’ combination too far. For example:

My boss gave him and I tickets to the show.

No! Take out ‘him’ and see what you get? My boss gave I tickets to the show.

If you don’t believe me, how about AskOxford.com? Here’s what they say about it:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is correct: ‘my friend and me’ or ‘my friend and I’?

That depends on where you and your friend are in the sentence. In colloquial speech ‘me’ is often used where standard grammar requires ‘I’, especially when someone else is mentioned too. Sometimes people use ‘I’ instead of ‘me’, because they know ‘me’ is sometimes wrong, but have not understood the principle. (Others resort to ‘myself’, which can sound rather pompous.)

I am the subject of the sentence, but the object of the sentence is me.
If in doubt, take your friend out of the sentence.

Me and my friend went to a party last night. [Wrong]
I and my friend went to a party last night.

My friend and me went to a party last night. [Wrong]
My friend and I went to a party last night.

The mayor has invited me and my husband.
The mayor has invited I and my husband. [Wrong]

The mayor has invited my husband and me.
The mayor has invited my husband and I. [Wrong]

Incidentally, saying ‘my friend and I’ instead of ‘I and my friend’ is not better grammar, it’s just being polite.

Whew, it’s good to get that off my chest.

26 Nov 2005 Canal Street Chooks and Their Fellow Fowl
 |  Category: Photography  | 2 Comments

Continuing along what appears to be a bird theme, it seems I have a thing for taking photos of chickens trussed up and hung in windows.

I took the photo at left along the south side of Canal Street near Broadway the other day with the Pentax. On a lark, I clicked on the ‘chicken’ tag and brought up the photo on the right, taken four months ago (from today, actually) in Chinatown in Vancouver with the Canon. I’m sure the psychiatric community has something to say about this.

26 Nov 2005 More Packbawkies
 |  Category: Photography  | Leave a Comment

Pentax K-1000

I took this from South Street Seaport, New York City, on Thursday — Brooklyn Bridge is in the background.

In the previous post I asked for a caption for the open-mouthed gull, and Socar’s poem “The Packbawky Anthem” was the first on the list (click on the photo to see the rest of the suggestions/comments — they’re all pretty good!). First posted here.

“We are the voices that herald the dawn,
Throats stretched to welcome the morning’s first yawn.
We are the painters of balconies high,
Whitewashing buildings that puncture the sky.
We are the sweepers that tidy the street;
What we can’t carry, we’ll gratefully eat.
Like us or lump us, when all’s done and said
We’ll still be going when you lot are dead.

Hark as we trumpet the daybreak refrain!
Joyful and ardent, come sun or come rain.
Find us in winter, all poised on one foot,
Huddled together, our anthem to flute.
Find us in springtime, askew on the wall,
Drunken on nectar and ready to fall.
Like us or lump us, when all’s done and said
We’ll still be squawking when you lot are dead.

And should we, all clumsy, bespatter your brow
With feculent whitewash, don’t raise a row–
Though slimy and smelly and dodgy to duck,
Our leavings are rumored to bring you good luck.
Oh, join in our chorus, come join in the song!
Thousands of jubilant birds can’t be wrong!
Like us or lump us, when all’s done and said
We’ll still be singing when you lot are dead.”

–Socar J. Myles

24 Nov 2005 {caption me}
 |  Category: Photography, Travel  | 4 Comments

Any suggestions for this squawker in front of the Brooklyn Bridge? (If you’re in Flickr, click on the pic and add it there.)